Who answers for this agent?
Give every agent an accountable business owner, technical steward, purpose, and review cadence.
AI agent governance
Grid connects every AI agent to a named owner, a defined purpose, the access it holds, and the outcomes it is expected to produce.

What governance must answer
AI agent governance becomes useful when teams can answer the same operating questions for every agent—without reconstructing the story from model logs, access consoles, spreadsheets, and tribal knowledge.
Give every agent an accountable business owner, technical steward, purpose, and review cadence.
Keep systems, permissions, credentials, and policy decisions attached to the agent record.
Review activity, cost, interventions, accepted work, and business outcomes in the same context.
The operating loop
Grid gives security, operations, finance, and business owners one shared record for the decisions they already have to make.
Find the agents already running across teams and tools.
Record an owner, purpose, scope, and expected result.
Connect access and controls to the work they permit.
Revisit risk, cost, and outcomes as the agent changes.
Evidence for the operating model
Our notes separate what has been observed from what teams should test next.
Common questions
AI agent governance is the operating system of ownership, access, controls, review, and outcome accountability around autonomous or semi-autonomous AI work. It covers the complete agent in production—not only the underlying model.
At minimum, track each agent's owner, purpose, model and harness, systems and permissions, activity, cost, interventions, review state, and accepted business outcomes.
Model governance focuses on model selection, evaluation, and risk. Agent governance adds the harness, tools, identities, permissions, owners, workflows, and business results that determine what the deployed system actually does.
Start with who is already at work
Map the agents, owners, access, activity, cost, and outcomes already taking shape across the company.